Group Discussion

Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:

  • Assume, you one of the member of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Express your positive attitude towards providing the solution.
  • Post your answer now.

Avinash said: (Feb 4, 2021)  
There should be upper age for politician to take part in election. Because due no restriction in their retirement age young politician who have great vision and mission does not get easy chance to do something better for their locality. It should be mandatory to have retirement age so that more young mind come and make career in politics, It indirectly helps in improving the condition because new one try to take appreciation from society and for that he/she do their work sincerely.

Rate this: +0 -0

Hina said: (Jan 26, 2021)  
Hello everyone.

I believe there should be a retirement age for politicians. We have retirement age in almost every field so why can't we have in politics?

If a person become a political leader then he will be a political leader till its last. As we know after certain time food starts detoriating means every food item has an expiry date because it loses its freshness and taste, this same is applicable in case of politicians as well. After sometime, people need new people to understand them.

Rate this: +1 -0

Umasankar Misra said: (Sep 28, 2020)  
The politicians in most of the cases are not extraordinary men. They have also physical and mental limitations. Normally, they should retire at the age of 60. Considering the developments in medical science and better healthcare facilities, people remain fit until the age of 80.

Since there is a dearth in the number of matured politicians in the country, we have to make a cut off at the age of 60 and a second term be allowed after a mandatory check by eminent doctors. A person meant for the third term again be monitored medically. Now Mr Modi is of the age of 70. Trump is around 80. Beyond 80 people should not be in active politics. President of our country, if found fit can work after 80 even.

Rate this: +1 -2

Hem Chaan said: (May 19, 2020)  
According to me, there should not be complete retirement from politics on the basis of age. Because, it takes time to learn for freshers in politics. So, the experience acquired by our senior politicians should not be wasted.

So, I think there should be a role of senior advisor before the retirement from politics.

My view,

Joining politics (age>21).
In politics and serving for nation (<60).
Senior Advisor for newbies (60<age<65).
Retirement (age>65).

Rate this: +9 -1

Rishu Kumar said: (Nov 14, 2019)  
Yes there should be an retirement age of politicians because the politicians after 60-70 age he/she is facing such a disease and gut health down day by day and the thinking problem also occur. This why every politicians have an retirement age.

Rate this: +15 -4

Ravi said: (Sep 9, 2019)  
Hi, I am Ravi.

In my point of view, the retirement of politician compulsory 60 to 65 years. Because this is the best time of retirement, the 60 to 65 before retirement time this age of people energy able and thinking deeply & taking the perfect decision. After this age of people week energy and come health problem.

Rate this: +15 -6

Yuvraj Upadhyay said: (Aug 26, 2019)  

This is Yuvraj upadhyay,

I think that there should be the age of 70 after which a political leader should be retired as a social leader also had an social life in which they need some rest and if we just want them to work for us then they can do it but they will get health issues and can change into serious problems. So, my suggestion of retirement of politicians is after the age of 70.


Rate this: +17 -4

Dinesh Kumar Bhati said: (Jul 21, 2019)  

This is Dinesh.

According to me, the retirement of a politician should be fixed because after 60 years. The mind of people's be distracted and he had do thinking to improve the condition of India like an advisor so he does behave like a child so I want that it should be because they are not capable for this. "thank you'.

Rate this: +10 -12

Samyuktha said: (Jun 20, 2019)  
Hi, this is Samyuktha.

So, friends in my point of view, that the retirement age for politicians is the best idea to be implemented.

That means if the political leader becomes old then they are not having so much of energy to rule the system. And also they are eating so much of money by ruling the parties years and years.

The retirement age is applicable to all government officers like that it should also be applicable to the political leaders.

That means every political leader must have up to 50 years of age is enough not more than that. After the age of that, they lose their vision capability and energy and feeling some sickness as our political leader like that Chandra Babu Naidu.

So I am not opposing that all our political leaders are not like that based upon their own energy.

The youth leader will have so much of ideas than the old leader.

So I conclude that the government should take necessary steps to implement this retirement age system very soonly.

Rate this: +20 -9

V K Mani said: (Apr 23, 2019)  
Definitely, the retirement age must be fixed for politicians when the retirement age is fixed for all other services, why not for them. And not more than one person from a family should be allowed to enter politics. These conditions should be there. The entire family enters politics and mainly to eat money. Within no time they become richest.

Rate this: +17 -5

Shivangi Suryawanshi said: (Mar 31, 2019)  
I think old politician more determined for work and country whether today's youth only wants to succeed in life. It does not matter how it gets.

Rate this: +16 -19

Nidhi Rajdev said: (Mar 13, 2019)  
I personally believe that older politicians have more experience and more knowledge of how this world works. They make much wiser decisions and above all, people tend to trust them instead of preferring a new, young politician.

Though young politicians would understand the current generation better but I think that age doesn't matter in any profession. If someone is good in what they do, then people do not see their age. Mr. Narendra Modi is 68 years old and he is still active with millions of supporters.

So, age is just a number and I don't think that the retirement age should be fixed.

Rate this: +27 -14

Manoj said: (Dec 26, 2018)  
To stop the usage of the politician's face as brand simple retirement age should be fixed. The court can increase retirement age if a person really good like Mr. Pon Manikavel.

Rate this: +8 -5

Vijeta Gupta said: (Aug 1, 2018)  
In my point of view,

Yes! I agree with this point that retirement must be in politicians. Youth will get a chance to prove his capability.

People says that old is gold. Yes, I agree with this. Politics depend on experience but it does not only depend upon experience. But, it also depends upon energy.

So, I think. It's better to have a retirement age for the politicians.

Rate this: +58 -8

Ravi Kumar said: (Jun 21, 2018)  
I think all opinion is similar or partial from each other. Experience people must be significant role for our country. So we can't be restrict their age limit in politics, so I urge or recommend to you please if those person having more talent we are not cabiable to controversy them.

Rate this: +15 -22

Vivek Mandal said: (Jun 7, 2018)  
Yeah, somewhere I agree with that point that there must a certain age for retirement. Because generally, we see that our leaders are too much older they are not able to do their daily work but due to our system, they are indulging in politics. Politics is not only depended upon experience but also it depends upon energy, decision making power and last it must be able to handle that pressure. I think these things are the very important things to be a good leader and think if youth will come on that field then somewhere there is a possibility that they can do better. As far as experience is a concern it will come gradually, in this way somewhere we are able to bring youth in politics.

Rate this: +41 -9

Anita said: (May 12, 2018)  
There should be the fixed retirement age for politicians i.e. 65 years. Why?

Because not only physically but also mentally a person is not that much creative or productive at an old age. May be few exception like Gandhi ji. But we are not short of the young population in India So, why should we give the burden of young population on old arms. As being a politicians is not an easy task. He has to take major decisions like signing deals, contracts, visiting other nations etc. All this thing require power, good health plus concentration. But at an old age we are not able to concentrate on any work most and most of the time we get health issue which tends to visit hospitals regularly and wasting time which should be given for the development of the nation. So we do not have any other option rather than fixing an age for the retirement. Even we can see for all other profession there is a fixed retirement age then why not for the politicians.

So our government have to think about our country and it has to think about people of our country by fixing an age for retirement of politician. On other thing that can be done they should be given another post like their valuable ideas and knowledge plus experience that should be utilised for the country.

To conclude I would like to say that we should be fixed an age for the retirement of the politicians this is good for them as well as our country. It can help for the development of our country so that young people can use innovative ideas for the the overall growth of people and our country.

Rate this: +72 -5

Rikin Vyas said: (Mar 4, 2018)  
According to my view,

A change is always welcome,

All government officials retire at 56 years in the state, while the public sector employees retire at 58 and the central government employees at 60 years.

"I feel the minimum age for contesting should be 30 years and the maximum age should be 75. In today's fast-paced life, a representative of the people should be able to move quickly and grasp things quickly".

Rate this: +13 -8

Ranjit said: (Feb 19, 2018)  
If the politicians are Good and work then he can serve the nation till last movement.

Rate this: +12 -17

Sasanth said: (Feb 16, 2018)  
Every firm, govt or pvt, fetches it's max potential output by replacing weak minds by energetic ones. It's only for the better running of the firm. Don't our country need a better running? So my opinion is to fix a retirement age for them too.

Rate this: +10 -2

Naveena D said: (Feb 6, 2018)  
Good Evening Friends,

According to me, retirement age system also used for develop the country. Because even it will be prevent corruption. And other thing is youths may be come into the politics or other kind of people may be come.

So they may be change our country without problems. So opinions will be different. So changes will give for someone. So retirement age is also good one.

Rate this: +18 -9

Kaushik Shubham said: (Feb 2, 2018)  
I think that have a fixed retirement age of desirable because better experience is not mistake to. Any design regard the country's development.

Rate this: +6 -12

Niranjan Kumar said: (Jan 10, 2018)  
I think there should be a retirement age for politicians too. The age is debatable.

I think 65 is a good time for retirement.
Some people are saying that the more experienced the better.

Please note that "age" is not equal to experience.

If you think a person below 50 can't manage well, then you are not trusting yourself.
From age of 25 to 45, you have 20 years of experience, which is not less.
Think people think. Don't be afraid to take the responsibilities.
Gandhi ji started a revolution when he was below 40.

We need more young people like Gandhi.

- who are not afraid to question the "normal",
- who has the courage to stand up and speak.
- who has the dare to take decisions.

Rate this: +30 -8

Vimal Sharma. said: (Dec 1, 2017)  
H! Guys,

I'm Vimal Sharma.

As we all know.

When our former president Mr. Apj Abdul Kalam was giving his speech. He had a heart attack. Therefore. There is no age limitation.

According to me, in this topic, Should not be politician age of retirement. Because as we all know that, every person has not keep leadership qualities.

Or to be a leader you must have a good experience new ideas n new technologies. And he has a creative mind.

And which keep AAP the qualities.

All this can be found the only experience.

So I considered that Should not be age limitation for a politician.

According to me, politician age doesn't matter.

Rate this: +16 -17

Ashutosh said: (Nov 23, 2017)  
In my point of view, retirement due to age is just not a criterion for politicians but, it should be the decision of peoples. As we know politicians are public servants and we are the people who select them, we have also the power of judging them what they can do now by analyzing their capability and previous political career. If he was a good one and never took part in corruption, then he was allowed to serve for us.

Rate this: +19 -5

Saloni said: (Sep 14, 2017)  
Hii everyone.

As we all know that politics is totally based on experience, knowledge and new techniques of a particular person to improve the condition of.

Our country. New ideas means youth and experience means the well established politicians both are the subset of a good government. So I don't think there is any restriction on age for politicians but its also important that young minds should also be the part of this.

Rate this: +19 -10

Dheeraj said: (Aug 19, 2017)  
Hello, friends. I think that having a fixed retirement age is not desirable because a better-experienced one is not prone to make mistakes in making decisions regarding the country's development. Though it does not give the new ones to take participate then also it helps on the country's advancement. And not giving the opportunities to new ones, does not harm the system, then not having a fixed age for retirement is worth full.


Rate this: +14 -3

Nam said: (Jun 17, 2017)  
This is not good for our country because retirement people take rest after retirement and enjoying his life. I think ministers and legislators always elect those candidate those have completed mpsc and upsc those knowledgeble people are leading great than uneducated minister.

Rate this: +8 -11

Palak said: (Jun 16, 2017)  
In my views. People in politics must have a retirement date. They should be the one who encourages the youth of the nation to come up and gets involved in political. As the era is changing. It is the need of hour. Not saying that they should quit totally but they should be the pillars of the young politicians and need to support them as well as oppose them if they do something worng but that doesn't mean that they should not be given chance. Politician should leave away their greed to remain in power. People too want fresh options.

Rate this: +49 -5

Satish K said: (Apr 29, 2017)  
Yes, Retirement is necessary for politicians and retirement the have to work as an adviser for those who come next to them.

In ancient days, when the kings were ruled people, " the kings are at a younger age and the kings ruled their kingdom on the advice of mantri (minister or adviser).

At that time India was the richest country in the world.

Rate this: +25 -3

Rakesh said: (Jan 26, 2017)  
Hello, friends.

I too think that there should be the retirement age in the field of politics also, as there is in every other service. I am not telling that after a certain age is crossed do not contact them but they can become mentors for the young leaders by guiding them with their wisdom and experience.

Rate this: +27 -6

Sangramsinh Shinde said: (Jan 24, 2017)  
I think there should be no retirement age of politicians.

Politics is one of the good sectors to develop our country and also drive it in good way it is possible if more experienced persons are in politics.

Rate this: +17 -20

Rahul Choudhary said: (Jan 23, 2017)  
I don't feel that there is a need to introduce a cap on the retirement age for politicians, because-

1. Politicians are public servants and as long as the public wants them to serve and is happy with their working, why they should retire? Besides this, if the public is unsatisfied with their working, then public has the power to remove them from power in the next elections.

2. Politicians who are serving good service to the nation and who haven't been involved in corruption in past are a great asset to the country.

3. Public may lose hope in the party or lose credibility in the party if the politician in which they believe or have faith will no longer be there in the party. For e.g, most of the people today are backing BJP in elections, only because of Mr. Modi.

4. The experience which a senior politician have cannot be simply replaced by someone who is new to politics.

5. Politicians may also help to maintain diplomatic relations, who may have an impact if they retire.

6. People have a sentiment of hope and believe attached to a politician, and their retirement may cause anger and chaos in the public. For e.g, take the example of late CM Jayalalitha, people of TN praises her and admire her. Imagine the reaction of the public if she was made to retire before her death!

So, I think there is no need to set a retirement age for politicians, people have ultimate power in democracy and it is them, who decides who can or cannot serve the nation.


Rate this: +79 -14

Omar Shah said: (Dec 15, 2016)  
I think age should not be the criteria for the politicians rather it should be their efficiency and competitiveness and we should not forget it's we people who are electing them to lead us so at the time of electing our representatives we should make our decision purely on the basis of their performance on field. And we know India is very large country and have very important role in international affairs as well so we need the people with experience to lead the country and make better decisions for the betterment of the nation and at the same time we should also encourage the participation of youth in the politics.

Rate this: +18 -14

Thanveer said: (Nov 11, 2016)  
Yes, there should be retirement age for politicians but for certain years like 70 to 75 but they should rule more than government employees and private employees and we have to find the new technologies so better to give chances for the youth some of the politicians also corrupted.

Rate this: +21 -9

Nikita Kumawat said: (Nov 10, 2016)  
Yes, there should be retirement age for politicians as there is a retirement age for government employees and public sector employees, there should be retirement age for politicians also. Employees are retired on the basis of their age because they are not so physically fit and doesn't have good stamina as compare to youngsters. So for better and efficient work at offices retirement is given to the employees who are aged and youngsters are given chances. So, in the same way, politicians also need retirement and youngsters should be given chances for ruling country for its betterment with better ideas but of course that candidate should be qualified and experienced for that position.

Rate this: +25 -5

N.Madhulika said: (Oct 4, 2016)  
According to me, there should be retirement for politician to do this firstly people should have an idea about the leader whom they are casting votes.

1) What are the educational qualifications of the leader?

2) What are thoughts and new ideas he has.

3) Is he was corrupted or not.

4) Is he was capable of solving the problems etc.

So the people goes on like this definitely, we can choose a better leader.

Rate this: +13 -6

Kola Samual said: (Sep 27, 2016)  
In my opinion, there should not any retirement age for politicians because it's not a joke to take decisions. Because it's related to state, country, and India is a place where we found different languages, religious, and cast. So one small mistake makes a huge difference or a problem for everyone and become a big mess so we want a people who have a knowledge as well as the experience to solve the problems related to the nations.

Rate this: +13 -7

Venkatesh said: (Sep 6, 2016)  
In my opinion, retairment age for the politicians is necessary but it should be somewhat larger than our government employees (it should be in between 65 to 70). If we don't give having the retirement age for the politicians then we might have lost some knowledge and skills of the young people. When the people will get old they are unable to move also what should they do for the country's growth. For old people, we have to spend a lot of security expenses. So retirement age for the politicians is necessary.

Rate this: +29 -5

Shaikh Asma said: (Aug 11, 2016)  
According to me, there shouldn't be any retirement age for politicians because experienced person or leader perform better as compared to the young generation.

Rate this: +13 -32

Ruturaj Pradhan said: (Jul 15, 2016)  
As per our constitution, all the citizen of India has the equal rights to stand in the election. For this criteria, the candidate must be the Indian citizen & the age of the candidate is minimum 25 years. If there is some retirement age for politicians, then in our country the older citizen have lost their right to stand in the election.

In my view, there should not be any retirement age for politicians because the aged politicians have more experience by handling the issues of people for the long period of time. Again a person's ability to serve his country can not be judged by his age. As we all know politicians have to take decision for the whole country, so experience is very much required in politics.

Again if there is an age limit for politicians, then family politics will increase in India. Suppose a politician will retire at certain age, then that politician will promote his son or daughter for his post. So a younger person without political background, can not get any type of benefit from the retirement of politicians.

At last I will say that if Mahatma Gandhi is retire at the age of 60 or 65, then it is difficult for India to get independent. So in India, there should not be any retirement age for politicians.

Rate this: +51 -19

Pious said: (Jun 29, 2016)  
In my point of view, to a greater extent, I think that age limit in politics is a desirable one. We should have to make the way for the youth to bring out new ideas and thoughts. As we all know that India is in the hands of youth. It is a fact that a better-skilled one is better than an experienced person. So, youth should have to get a chance to work for their nation and fulfil present generation needs.

Rate this: +18 -6

Kaustubh said: (Jun 27, 2016)  
I think there should not be retirement age rule for politicians. Because a politician becomes more experienced day by day in handling the issues of people.

Talking about the generation gap, a well experienced politician has ability to think according to new generation's mind.

For example: our PM!

Rate this: +22 -14

Avanish The Learner said: (Jun 26, 2016)  
Hello friends, in my point of view, I agree with this point that politics is a matter of experience and everyone knows that old is gold but question is this today India has 65% youth in all over its population 1.25 Arab and it is regarded on the world level that a nation always depends upon the bulky pillars and this is known by youths so I think leaders should be retired at the age of 60. I want to include one more point if they are being retired, we should not leave them forever but we'll have to give them a forum by which they could share his experience with us and if we needed some help we take from them. And one more thing, this type of our youths will get a chance to prove his quality and capability. Thus we will not be away our leader and the young generation too. For example in the world scenario a lot of youngsters who had changed the mentality of humans and created a new world they were {Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, Napoleon, Sikandar, Swami Vivekanand, Srinivasan Ramanujan, queen of Jhansi Lakshmi bai, Shivaji, etc}. So we should give a chance to the new generation. Have a nice time thanks.

Rate this: +26 -6

Somya Sharma said: (Jun 24, 2016)  
Hi guys, this is Somya Sharma.

I respect the points of everyone that all of you have given but after listening all of you I wanna say that there should be age limit as many guys said that mostly people loss their health and then they are not so capable to serve the country and by this youth will a get chance to serve the country.

After that I wanna say that if a person is really doing well and if he/she has the capacity to serve the country and if that person is interested so he/she must be given the chance for doing good work.

But if a person in age limit is not doing well then he must be retired because he is not able to do this work.

Many guys said that if old experience and new ideas will be mixed then country will grow rapidly.

Thank you.

Rate this: +13 -4

Priyanka Nair said: (Jun 13, 2016)  
Hello, friends!

I beg to differ. An ideal leader should have a lot of knowledge and experience. And experience comes with age. Based on personal experience, I have been treated better by aged doctors than young ones. I feel that is so because of all the experience they possess. The older, the better :D.


Rate this: +16 -14

Pankaj said: (May 27, 2016)  
According to me, this can develop the country rapidly if we combine the experience of old age and encouragement of new generation politicians.

Rate this: +19 -3

Sai said: (May 21, 2016)  
I think there should be a retirement age limit in politics as the younger generation may come up with newer ideas and thoughts in improving the society and also 90.2% of the population in India are youth the.

Obama's Age = 54.

Pranabji's Age = 80.

By this, I wanna show say youth should also come forward to participate in politics.

Rate this: +16 -12

Chandrakumar said: (May 16, 2016)  
Retirement age needs to be 58 as applicable to Government employees.

It can be 68 (2 terms from retirement age) for contesting in Indian politics. They can be an adviser or in any other post in the party, but not a contestant.

Rate this: +10 -9

Kcdewangan said: (May 13, 2016)  


1. Dynasty system in politics will be automatically stopped.

2. Corruption will be reduced due to detachment of "Power Mania".

3. Employment opportunity will be increased in political background.

4. Pressure will be developed in political parties for keeping deserved quality leaders.

5. Minimum qualification for MPs & MLAs must be graduation.

6. Youth will get a chance to work for the country and will fulfil the present generation need.

7. To keep country always young by reducing generation gap.

8. To build peace and to reduce violent extremism.

9. For common working is between 25 to 60 years, we can say it the main stream of the country. Then why not country should run by mainstream leaders.

10. After retirement, we generally think as bonus life and people need to rest , keep good health, enjoy family life, fulfil personal hobbies and guide their young one (on need basis).

Rate this: +42 -6

Bidyut said: (May 12, 2016)  
I think there should not be any age limit because as far as politics is concerned skills come with experience and skills lead to the development of the country. If some politician is good enough at their work and able to bring peace and development we should keep promoting him. A retirement in politics is not like that a vacancy has been created just like in some companies and people got recruited in their positions. If young ones want to join then they can open their own parties and show their skills. But if we put an age limit we have to lose some politicians who are exceptionally good at their fields.

Rate this: +22 -7

Saurifoxy said: (Apr 30, 2016)  
I think retirement in politics is a very important factor. If you would not keep any retirement requirement then the aged people will not leave their positions for the young generation. Keeping in mind the future generation is always advanced in thinking and working they may perform very greatly. Giving a hold of power for a long time in one's hand may result in greedy thinking and miss use of politics and even if they have an experience they may use it in their own favor. In politics experience of 20 to years is more than sufficient by my opinion. As you will keep age limit in politics there will naturally be young people with courage and passion as well as aged people having experience. Experienced close to retirement may help young generation in guidance.

Decision made by young people may probably based on detailed information which will lead to proper development. (REQUIREMENT:-for which the young politician should be of proper qualifications).

By proper calculation of different age population in India and its probability, you may fix age limit on that basis where you may have proper age flow in politics with young as well as experienced generation. Thus age limit is essential in politics.

Rate this: +11 -3

Pallab Sarkar said: (Apr 12, 2016)  
My opinion is that politicians should have no age of retirement because if he/she has the ability to drive a nation effectively with honesty and peace we should support him/her rather asking for his/her age of retirement.

Thank you.

Rate this: +13 -12

K.Haribabu said: (Apr 7, 2016)  
In my point of view, there is a some loss and some benefit by giving the retirement age to positions. If we provide retirement age we lose the great experienced persons. At the same time, we provide the retirement age of chance to participate young and energetic persons. So we provide the retirement age based on talent in solving the problems faced by the country at any time.

Rate this: +12 -5

Sachin Kumar said: (Mar 30, 2016)  
I think, Experience is the key to the growth of any organisation even a country. The experienced person has more problem-solving skills on their basis of their practical experience. We have seen in the history that experienced leader has served the country with more interest. So, there should not be any age limit for politicians.

Rate this: +21 -10

Salman said: (Mar 28, 2016)  
I think retirement is must because the majority of politicians are busy for making money may be its legal or illegal so it ts compulsory to retirement for position according to their record, not an age.

Rate this: +8 -7

Gaurav said: (Mar 24, 2016)  
I think the age limit for politicians is necessary because the politicians give more concentration for the growth of a country. Also, have important benefits due to this it gives chances to the young thinking.

Rate this: +6 -6

Tamil said: (Mar 12, 2016)  
Hello all.

Of course the retirement for politicians is must. But it should not depend their age. It should depend their political records. For example, which one has the properties or assets in illegal, should resign his or her post. Then only we can get good political leaders. Because the concept of retirement is to make young and good political leaders.

Rate this: +14 -6

Shekha4 said: (Mar 12, 2016)  
In my opinion retirement age of politician is must have. Because young people to take part in our nation.

Rate this: +6 -6

Savitha said: (Mar 9, 2016)  
In my opinion, there should be an age limit for the politicians. For making good decisions experience plays a major role, but at the same time we need to give a chance to young aspiring minds to work for the nation, but for the effective politicians we need experience and energetic politicians for this if young politicians trained under experienced politicians it will be better.

Rate this: +10 -5

Manoj Kumar Mahto said: (Mar 5, 2016)  
Hello everyone. A green good evening to all viewer.

In my opinion. Of course, there should be an age limit of the politician. And have a proper retirement of the leader. Because we are a youth and we have to give up a chance to serve the nation. And of course experience is precious mother. But look at another part. That means I am talking about enthusiasm, energy, and also physical and mental ability. Youth have all. So we have to choose a young leader with new thought and peak energy level. So that our nation going to another kind of success. And the retired leader also serves the nation beside of the main leader and gave a proper direction to him. Just like coach in cricket and all games.

Rate this: +23 -3

Kumudini said: (Feb 19, 2016)  
In my view a person's ability to work and serve the nation can not be judged by his age. As politician are meant to take decision for the whole country. So experience is very much required. But I also think there should be a balance between the energy and experience. For a proper growth we need innovative ideas and that enthusiasm which will come from the youth.

Rate this: +8 -1

Kumudini said: (Feb 19, 2016)  
In my view a person's ability to work and serve the nation cannot be judged by his age. As politician are meant to take decision for the whole country. So experience is very much required. But I also think there should be a balance between the energy and experience. For a proper growth we need innovative ideas and that enthusiasm which will come from the youth.

Rate this: +8 -6

Vivek Kumar said: (Feb 18, 2016)  
According to me retirement age of any politician doesn't matter but question comes what matters? We can see there are so many politician who made our country very proud of their political work and still they are working to guide our youth to jump into politics. We are youth and we need to experience to become good politician. So we need to work under master politician to grab some experience to become a good leader.

Rate this: +10 -2

Abhay Chhatrodiya said: (Feb 13, 2016)  
First refer following Personalities:

1. Chanakya (kautilya).
2. Mahatma Gandhi.
3. Mao Ze Dong.
4. Winston Churchill.
5. Franklin Roosewelt.

All of these are the great political personalities world ever had. They continue their practicing even at last stage of their lives. And I am sure nobody will question at their capabilities of their minds.

One's age shouldn't be concerned with respect to his/her talent. What politicians need is Honesty, patriotism, morality, Ethics and lot of hard work to represent the brighter side of the country at international level.

If any politician has above mentioned qualities, we should accept him/her without concerning their age.

Rate this: +77 -10

Manoj Kumar Pal said: (Feb 11, 2016)  
Hello friends I agree with you that age doesn't matters for politician. But who have above 60 there are more experienced and also good decision making but they don't more enthusiastic, dynamic and energetic.

So I would like to said there are be the mentors of young politicians, who are energetic, enthusiastic, creative, innovative and know about more technology to solve the problems of our country. But in decision making they should proper consulting to experience leaders/politicians.

Rate this: +10 -11

Ino said: (Feb 11, 2016)  
There should not be any age limit to the retirement age of politicians as the amount of experience they have can be put to good use and can act as advisers to the decision making unit.

At the same time young talent should also be considered and promoted. As we are having a major part of our population as youngsters, having the right combination of young blood and experienced lot would serve as a great tool towards national growth.

Rate this: +2 -5

Akash Rawat said: (Jan 29, 2016)  
In my opinion, there should be a fixed age for retirement of a politician, because, younger peoples can run government better than them, as they knew much more about the needs of today's generation.

Rate this: +11 -7

Aravind said: (Jan 23, 2016)  
Hi friends. I agree with some points and my opinion is, retiring a politician doesn't make sense because they might get more experienced by age and not expired, however, considering the young budding politicians, the old expert level politicians can be formed with two panels such as an objective critic panel and an advisory body in order to guide the young politicians.

Rate this: +8 -2

Sree said: (Jan 19, 2016)  
My opinion is there should be no age limit for retirement of politician because the senior citizen can known all the well development for the country. Nowadays most of the young persons are entering into the politics and they are making more illegal activities instead of giving them a chance we have to choose seniors for making good decisions. Most of the young persons don't know how to make decisions, but where has a senior person has a experience to make a right decision.

Rate this: +12 -21

Sriram Rdn said: (Jan 7, 2016)  
Hi friends,

We should accept the fact that experience matters in any field but there should be age limit for the politicians so that it paves way for young people who are aspiring to serve the country.

When new people are entering into politics especially the young people may implant new ideas and projects which could change the fate of present politics.

Thank you.

Rate this: +28 -10

Muthu said: (Dec 30, 2015)  
According to me retirement is necessary to provide chance for others and to establish their new ideas but on the other side new people not have much experience to handle the whole responsibility. So new people want to take training under some experts for particular period.

Rate this: +17 -5

Vinay Kumar said: (Dec 14, 2015)  
Hi this Vinay Kumar,

I prefer to that the retirement must be in politics, I am a Indian, in our country most of the politicians are old citizens, they are almost 60 crossed. This people are fall down after certain age then after the fresh politicians, almost young are entered into the politics, they cannot take correct decisions, this may effect the people.

So the old politicians&old leaders are used as mentors this type of democracy makes perfect democracy & successful government.

Rate this: +15 -3

Varunraj said: (Dec 14, 2015)  
My opinion and regarding of this topic.

We take government job they have required retirement age 58 but we take politics any retirement is not required so most of uneducated people think once became a politician we make money life long.

In India few party are ruled over the country how long they ruined the country they did not give any chance for youngsters so the youngsters did not come to the politics. That is the main reason India did not getting a successor employer.

Rate this: +5 -5

Ram said: (Dec 10, 2015)  
Hi every one,

We know the proverb in English, even all the languages. "Experience makes man perfect", it will applicable in all the field. Even the younger generations are very advance in technology but they can't take accurate decisions in all the situations,

Hence, we require both Seniors and Younger to lead the country, for e.g in a family most of the decisions are are taken by the father, to attain the goal with the co-operation of entire family (younger son, daughter etc) same applicable in politics also.

Hence, age limits are not barrier for politicians at the same time the chances are should be given to the youth like us. Guys are agree with me right?

Rate this: +25 -5

R C Chand said: (Dec 4, 2015)  
Since the politicians are people's representative let the voters decide their career. In my opinion if they are discarded by the voters once after the age 60, they must retire from the politics.

Rate this: +4 -4

Sanjeev said: (Dec 2, 2015)  
Hi Friends,

When you are in Government Job you have a retirement age. But when you are a politician you don't have any retirement age. Why?

Rate this: +10 -10

Abhideep said: (Nov 26, 2015)  
Hi everyone, in my opinion, I don't think that the age limit should be imposed on politicians because:

1. Age cannot be criterion for judging someone's working ability.

2. We need experienced people to understand and take some crucial decisions in favor of the mass.

But also we need youth to enter in the politics because:

1. India having the largest youth population (around 326 millions people in the age GRP of 10 to 24) needs more enthusiastic and energetic minds to represent them which can implement innovative ideas for better future.

2. Sometimes it happens that with the same person getting elected again n again some issues do not get resolved because of the same approach/mindset towards those problems and hence we need someone with fresh approach.

3. Old seats need to be vacated for giving chance to young aspiring minds.

But since we want both energy and experience in our system, this is what I propose: We can have age limit at the lower levels like MLA's and Ward members etc. Where people elected can be youth and they can act as the bridge to fill the gap between the mass and aged politicians at the MP level.

This way, these young people can get experience working at lower level under the supervision of these aged politicians and later on they can get promoted to that level which usually happens.

Rate this: +27 -8

Diwakar said: (Nov 26, 2015)  
Hello everyone,

In my point of view age is not the factor by which you can judge the ability of the candidate, we have seen many example in our daily life that a 10th std. Student invent a new technology, while lot of engineers are not capable to do a simple thing.

So, according to me the creativity of mind depends on person not their age, we need a leader for the development of our country, and he must have potential to do new thing for the nation. Doesn't matter what age of he is.

Rate this: +17 -7

Sheffali said: (Nov 18, 2015)  
Yes the age limit should be there for the politicians so that our youth who are interested in politics get an opportunity to participate in elections and also if a good participant gets elected he could apply his ideas to eliminate the bad myths of our society.

Rate this: +7 -6

Marmque said: (Nov 12, 2015)  
Hi friends,

An aged politician can be more knowledgeable but look at the other part of his physical strengths which is also equally important, an aged politician cannot show up enthusiasm. In country like India people always wish their leader to be enthusiastic, dynamic, physically and mentally fit. So in nut shell to say retirement slab for politicians is a healthy move.

But along with that we also need great energy and positive spirit which youngsters have. So, in my opinion the ruling body or cabinet should also have a reservation for young leaders making it a combination of experience and energy.

Rate this: +6 -5

Anshul said: (Nov 11, 2015)  
Hello everyone,

According to me, the politicians are one of the important asset for a country. The thing that we expect from the politicians is good decision making capability in favor of the country.

The most important thing for this is his diplomatic and political knowledge and experience. To become a decision maker, takes a lot of time. So, I support that there should be no age limit for politicians.

Rate this: +3 -3

Umesh said: (Nov 1, 2015)  
Most of the politicians are corrupted they store money to there swiz account anonymously so the retirement criteria provide the break between the corruption which further help in the development of the country with the help of this the government rule and regulation are settled very well.

Rate this: +6 -4

Pankaj said: (Oct 23, 2015)  
This is very good topic. According to me age limit of politician is 100% correct most of politician corrupted so age limit very important. So younger politician are come soon so progress the nation and also growth of nation.

Thank you.

Rate this: +14 -5

Janardan Dhavan said: (Oct 22, 2015)  
I think retirement age for politician is must. Because first of all politicians are mainly a human being. As age crosses above 65 humans feel tired, his mental and physical ability reduces. I didn't think that politician above age 65 should rest at home. They had another option to guide young politicians.

Rate this: +7 -5

Suresh said: (Oct 10, 2015)  
According to my point of view, there must be retirement age to politicians so that the new younger people who entered into politics and haven't made any corruptions will make some of bills like Lokpal against corruption. Moreover in developed countries like america the terms for president are two only.

Rate this: +5 -1

Vanitha said: (Oct 10, 2015)  
Yes, of course we, the people should agree that nothing is static. So there is a need of retirement for politicians too. So even now, if they don't go ahead with retirement policy, people remains same and too problem remains same. We knows that experienced remains a lot.

Even now, the experienced candidates are head of our Indian politics and still they are fighting against their own matters not people matters. So if they retired at a certain age, may be some other people stands out and win, further they might change our nation tremendously better than others.

Changes will always change something.

Thank you.

Rate this: +9 -1

Sharan Nm said: (Oct 6, 2015)  
I think politicians who are above 60 needs a rest so age limit should be 60 because as you know in every govt employee has retirement age of 60 so they are not experienced? They are not well versed in the field? Then how come politicians continue there journey after 60.

And people who are now at 60 has many health issue they sleep in the Rajya Sabha hall, they get sleep in the meeting hall there are many peoples are disturbed with there health nowadays.

And for every issues they use old traditional method to solve, today we are surrounded with technology, till today same old papers are running on the table of Govt employee so when expect the change, definitely change is needed, we are dreaming for digital India to come true.

So I strongly feel politician age limit should be fixed.

Rate this: +10 -3

Ashutosh Joshi said: (Oct 1, 2015)  
No, there is no need to set a retirement age for politicians. We have seen many examples of leaders, our country has had, many of them, despite of their old age they did great job in the Indian politics, and there are also examples of young leaders who couldn't perform well in it, so in the history of Indian politics and even in the present scenario, I think age didn't matter. And also we do need some experienced leaders in our political system to run it efficiently with the help of their experience.

Rate this: +10 -6

Latesh said: (Sep 25, 2015)  
Yes, I agree to you Rajender Singh, but it should be ensured that the youngsters should not be corrupt minded. Youngsters are the future of our nation. They should manage the country responsibly. If done, the country soon will be fully developed.

Rate this: +4 -4

Rajender Singh said: (Sep 21, 2015)  
Hi everyone,

I think politician retirement age should be 60 years because many of politicians age above 65 years and should give the chance to youngsters as they have many ideas, ability to do work hard and it is good for our country for development.

Rate this: +20 -4

Chandann Mishra said: (Sep 19, 2015)  
Hi friends according to my perceptions I think most of you are support the retirement of politicization agree and know all the good ideas my aim is not to put anyone in confusion according to me teeth is no need for retirement for politicians. There is more need for experience leaders. However for develop the country there is more need of good experience leader. Let a example of Narendra Modi, he is a powerful leader. He do many type of work in comparison to new generation leaders.

Thank you.

Rate this: +10 -4

Anamika said: (Sep 19, 2015)  
Hello everyone,

According to my point of view, politicians must have a retirement age so that the youth will fetch an opportunity to exhibit their talents of making right choices for the development of our country. There are only few politicians who think and work for the improvement of our nation while others are corrupted. May be the youth can make a difference in improving the present condition of our nation. Of course they do need advice from experienced people.

Rate this: +4 -3

Nev said: (Sep 13, 2015)  

Well, I agree with most of you who says that retirement is necessary for politicians. To support my points I would say that from the 1st term or 2nd term of joining polities he could do everything needed either for developing purpose or getting money for personal gains and then after that the remaining years will be because of the wealth, respect and reputation which would help him to stay in polities that will have nothing to do with the country's development. So, its better to have a retirement age for a politicians.

Rate this: +7 -2

Hrishikesh Sonar said: (Sep 4, 2015)  
There should be a determined retirement age for politicians. As it gives the young blood chance to prove themselves by running nation. We know every job has a retirement age. Every coin has a two sides. Elder people have ample of experience. They make the younger generation known to the measures and principles of politics.

So I advice the constitution that there should be a age of retirement. But there should be some post in the government "the elderly advisory council".

Rate this: +11 -5

Pankaj Singh Bisht said: (Sep 4, 2015)  
I think age play a very important role in our life. But some political leader play a role in very long time which is very dangerous to country because they don't able to speak someone. So I think age of retirement of politician is 55 years.

Rate this: +13 -5

Manjit Singh said: (Sep 3, 2015)  
According to me in India the politicians time period should be for maximum 8-10 years. Because when they have joined politics his mind thought more than 90% in developing the country. After this period his mind thought just on earning money.

So this is depends upon the mental ability of person. If they do best work for the country then I think there is no need to retired a person. Otherwise if does not work properly then also no need to retired there is need to terminate.

Rate this: +10 -11

Jatin said: (Sep 2, 2015)  
According to me like in other sectors there should also be the retirement age in politics because we should also give chance to the youngsters as they are the future of the country and able to make good policies according to its new thinking.

In country like India where there are huge %of youngsters there should be a good young politicians who can easily understand the problem of the youth. So according to me there should be the retirement age for politicians.

Rate this: +6 -3

Ananymous said: (Sep 2, 2015)  
Hi guys.

My thought is that politicians should have a particular age when they would go out of seat, I know experience matters in this but the politicians need to give rise to younger ones in some places like Nigeria you can see a president still on seat at the age of 60 which is very wrong.

At a very old age like that all he can think of is how to embezzle money from the country income but if younger generations stand for president and eventually becomes a president he would have ideas on how to help the county at his young age I think the retirement age for president should be 60-70 years.

Rate this: +5 -2

Shivam said: (Aug 23, 2015)  
In all fields, besides politics and business, there should be a retirement age. But in case of politics experience matters. Because with the increment in age you are going to gain experience and with the help of experience you could do better than any other young blood experience is like an entropy which always increases with time. So, if experience has no age to be gained then I must say there should be no retirement age for politician.

Rate this: +10 -4

Retirement Age for Politicians

Name *:

Email   : (optional)

» Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.